Legal Opinion

Fauvergue v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 11, 2008No. 08-431LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

Presented as an issue of first impression after aigument on a contested motion to amend a complaint for a taking of property under the Rails to Trails Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1241-1251 (2000), is whether a class-action complaint can be amended to add named parties after the statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2501 (2000), has expired. The court rules that amendment of the complaint does not resolve the issue of whether a class-action complaint can be maintained for individual named plaintiffs or other class members, all of whom had claims that,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Fauvergue v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Birdbear v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  5. Fauvergue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API