Fauvergue v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
Presented as an issue of first impression after aigument on a contested motion to amend a complaint for a taking of property under the Rails to Trails Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1241-1251 (2000), is whether a class-action complaint can be amended to add named parties after the statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2501 (2000), has expired. The court rules that amendment of the complaint does not resolve the issue of whether a class-action complaint can be maintained for individual named plaintiffs or other class members, all of whom had claims that,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Fauvergue v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Birdbear v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Fauvergue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.