Legal Opinion

Prince v. Aucilla River Naval Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 19, 1931PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

In an action of trover against the plaintiffs in error the defendant in error recovered a judgment in the amount of $3,381.62.

There were two trials of the case, the second being tried before the Circuit Judge without a jury. The trial court found that the defendants had converted 700,000 feet of lumber of the value of $2,450.00, and rendered a verdict for that amount on the theory that the damages were assessable as against an innocent vendee from a mistaken trespasser under the rule laid down in Wright v. Skinner, 34 Fla. 453, 16 Sou. Rep. 335.

The evidenec has been examined and found amply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. Hardee TrusteesSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Germak v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. George W. Wright & Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. First Atlantic National Bank v. CobbettSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Special v. BauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Petion v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  5. Parsons v. Motor Homes of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API