Legal Opinion

Germak v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 30, 1928PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The declaration states an injury at a grade crossing in a municipality alleged to have been caused by the defendant in carelessly and negligently running and operating its train whereby it struck a motor driven vehicle in which plaintiff was riding, as the motor vehicle was crossing defendant’s tracks. Trial was had on a plea of not guilty. Yerdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant and the plaintiff took writ of error.

The court allowed counsel for each side one hour for argument to the jury. One of the counsel for the plaintiff made an opening argument for twenty minutes. Counsel…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. BerkshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. RusynikOhio Supreme Court · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tindall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. A. C. L. R. R. Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Collins Fruit Company v. GiglioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Prince v. Aucilla River Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Covington v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API