McPeak v. McPeak
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
After examining the record in this case we find that the age, earning ability, present income and assets of the parties after equitable distribution are sufficiently equal that neither permanent nor rehabilitative alimony should be awarded in this case.1 Likewise and for the same reason, *83the trial court was correct in declining to order the husband to pay the wife’s attorney’s fees.2 Accordingly the case is affirmed in all particulars except the award of permanent periodic alimony to the wife is reversed.
REVERSED.
COWART and PETERSON, JJ., and ANTOON, J., II, Associate Judge, concur.. See…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Campbell v. CampbellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- McIntyre v. McIntyreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Ariko v. ArikoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Sizemore v. SizemoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Blankenship v. BlankenshipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.