Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. Blankenship
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 19, 1987No. 86-131PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
502 So.2d 1002 (1987)
Larry Lee BLANKENSHIP, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
Kay Joanne BLANKENSHIP, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 86-131.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
February 19, 1987.
J. Russell Hornsby and Scott L. Sterling, of Law Offices of J. Russell Hornsby, P.A., Orlando, for appellant/cross-appellee.
Tanya M. Plaut, P.A., Orlando, for appellee/cross-appellant.
COWART, Judge.
Because of the broad discretion allowed the trial judge under Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980), we affirm the distribution and alimony awards in this case as against appeals by both…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- McIntyre v. McIntyreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Ariko v. ArikoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Sizemore v. SizemoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Sumner v. SumnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Straley v. FrankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Naugle v. NaugleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Straley v. FrankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Ball v. BallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Flanders v. FlandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.