Legal Opinion
Cobb v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 19, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0700PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, proceeding pro-se, sues-the United States “to stop the [United States Parole Commission] from continuing [its] decade-long practice of applying” its parole guidelines retroactively, in violation of the Constitution’s , ex post facto clause. Compl. ¶¶ 1-2, ECF No. 1. Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss the Compl., ECF.No. 10. Defendant argues that res judicata applies and, alternatively, that no claim for relief has been stated…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barroca v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Barroca v. SamuelsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Jenkins v. Devens Federal Medical Center MassachusettsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Van Kush v. 10th Circuit executive/administrative Office of the Judges (Ao)District Court, District of Columbia · 2020