Kellam v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

ZEHMER, Judge.

The state moves for rehearing of this case in light of the supreme court’s recent opinions in State v. V.A.A., 577 So.2d 941 (Fla.1991), and State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla.1991). The state contends that although this court correctly affirmed Kel-lam’s and Jackson’s separate convictions and sentences for sale or delivery of cocaine and possession of cocaine, we should rehear the case because we “did not resort to amended section 775.021(4)” in reaching our decision, and because conflict no longer exists between our decision and V.A.A. v. State, 561…