Legal Opinion

State v. V.A.A.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 28, 1991No. 75902PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted review of V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla.2d DCA 1990), to answer the following certified question of great public importance:

When a double jeopardy violation is alleged based on the crimes of sale and possession (or possession with intent to sell) of the same quantum of contraband and the crimes occurred after the effective date of section 775.021, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), is it improper to convict and sentence for both crimes? *

Id. at 315. We recently addressed this same question in State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla.1991), in which we answered the question in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. State v. McCloudSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. V.A.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. State v. StensonSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. State v. GilletteSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API