Legal Opinion

Matheny v. Wolffs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 26, 1865PublishedCited by 6 opinions

CASE 29 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE WILLIAMS

delivered-’the opinion of the court:

The appellees had contracted with Helh & Co. to erect for them a building on a lot at the corner of Third and Market streets, in the city of Louisville, which was to have a cellar eight feet deep. Helh & Co., in pursuance of their undertaking, had the cellar dug up to the edges of the pavement, the walls- of the excavation being perpendicular; ordinary cedar posts were laid along the outer margin of the pavement to prevent the dirt falling back as it was thrown on to the pavement from the excavation, and these common posts are said to have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hart v. Mayor of AlbanyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1832

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baumeister v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  2. Thomas v. HarringtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  3. Brown Hotel Co., Inc. v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  4. Morgan v. Big Woods Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Covington Saw Mill & Mfg. Co. v. DrexiliusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API