Legal Opinion

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Jersey City, Hoboken & Paterson Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 17, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Chief Justice.

This action was brought by the board of freeholders to recover from the defendant com*180pany a portion of the cost incurred by the board in the laying of a granite block pavement upon a portion of the Paterson plank road, a public highway of the county, through which the company operates an electric railway. This railway was originally constructed by the Jersey City, Hoboken and Rutherford Electric Railway Company, a corporation organized in 1893, under the Street Railway act of 1886. Comp. Btat., p. 1998. The eighteenth section of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barton Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. BickfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Creasey v. ZinkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1947
  3. Mechanics Finance Co. v. AustinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API