Legal Opinion

Scott v. Angerhofer

District Court, D. Utah

Decided September 23, 2024No. 2:20-cv-00014Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH JAMES SCOTT, MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER GRANTING REMAINING Plaintiff, DEFENDANT BURNHAM'S SUMMARY-JUDGMENT MOTION vs. Case No. 2:20-CV-14-DAK DAVID ANGERHOFER et al., District Judge Dale A. Kimball Defendants. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (SAC), brought primarily under

42 U.S.C.S. § 1983

(2024), is at issue. (ECF No. 22.) Remaining claims of inadequate medical treatment (under the Federal Constitution's Eighth Amendment1) and unnecessary rigor (under the Utah Constitution) stem from Plaintiff's interactions with the only remaining…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API