Legal Opinion
Sperry v. Moler
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 7, 1985No. 2712PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff, Robert Sperry, initiated this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The complaint is based on the breach of a construction contract and quantum meruit. The named defendant, Jeffrey E. Moler, and his wife, Elaine D. Moler, owners of the premises, pleaded negligence and breach of contract *693by way of a special defense and claimed damages for the delay. A judgment was rendered in favor of Sperry for $52,218.01. After the Molers’ motion to reargue was granted, a revised judgment for Sperry in the amount of $43,238.96 was rendered. No prejudgment interest or costs were awarded. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cecio Bros., Inc. v. FeldmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Fuessenich v. DiNardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Beckman v. JALICH HOMES, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Prime Management Company, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. John F. Steinegger and Nancy J. Steinegger, D/B/A Franz Melzer Associates, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Canton Motorcar Works, Inc. v. DiMartinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Perlmutter v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Fullerton v. McGowanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Simonetti v. LovermiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.