Legal Opinion
Priestley Faucett v. Move, Inc. d/b/a Realtor.com
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 23, 2025No. 2:22-cv-04948Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 PRIESTLEY FAUCETT, Case № 2:22-cv-04948-ODW (ASx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS 14 MOVE, INC. d/b/a REALTOR.COM, CERTIFICATION [114] 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Priestley Faucett brings this putative class action against Defendant 19 Move, Inc. d/b/a Realtor.com (“Move”), asserting claims under the Telephone 20 Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) ¶ 2, Dkt. No. 18.) 21 Faucett now moves for class certification pursuant to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.