Legal Opinion
BankAmerica Pension Plan v. McMath
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 2000No. 98-16543PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge Sneed; Concurrence by Judge Sneed.
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
This case arises from an interpleader action brought by the BankAmerica 401(k) Plan (“401(k) Plan”) and the BankAmerica Pension Plan (“Pension Plan,” collectively, the “Plans”) to resolve the proper beneficiaries of the benefits under the Plans. Defendants in the interpleader action, Alva M. Montgomery and Patsy Patterson (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in favor of the co-defendant Alexander S. McMath (“Mr. McMath”).…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Hector Montero-Martinez Gregorio Pedro Montero-Hernandez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Stephan Pardi v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Davis v. City of Las VegasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Mildred Johnson v. Lashanda Smith, Leonard Smith and Carolyn HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Ramirez v. City of Buena ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.