Ash v. Traynor
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] The Workers Compensation Bureau appeals from the district court’s amended judgment reversing the Bureau’s orders canceling disability benefits of fourteen claimants because each claimant began receiving social security retirement benefits. We affirm the judgment of the district court, holding the Bureau erred in avoiding a valid obligation to pay disability for each claimant.
I
[¶ 2] Fourteen claimants challenged the retirement presumption under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-09.3 as enacted in 1995 and amended in 1997. Each claimant had “attained retirement,” as defined under N.D.C.C.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Gregory v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Sprunk v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Loberg v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Nemec v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stewart v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Heitkamp v. Family Life Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Saari v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Tedford v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Clayburgh v. American West Community Promotions, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.