Legal Opinion

Giwa v. City of Peoria

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided January 8, 2013No. 09-1306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

JOHN A. GORMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Now before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (# 43). The motion is fully briefed and I have carefully considered the arguments and evidence presented by the parties. As explained herein, the motion is granted.

I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT GENERALLY

The purpose of summary judgment is to “pierce the pleadings and to assess the proof in order to see whether there is a genuine need for trial.” Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). Under…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melgoza v. Rush University Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  2. Miller v. City of AuroraDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API