Legal Opinion

Anna National Bank v. Wingate

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 28, 1978No. 77-393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Friedman

This action grows out of the execution, in 1967, of a note by the defendant and his great-uncle, R. V. Tuthill. The parties agree that the proceeds of the note were used to pay expenses incurred by defendant in beginning his law practice and were never repaid by him. There is a further agreement that R. V. Tuthill was an accommodation maker of the note under the provisions of article III, section 3 — 415 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1967, ch. 26, par. 3 — 415).

Following the death of R. V. Tuthill in late 1967, the payee of the note, the State Bank of Anna, brought suit upon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bartel v. ZimmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Crawford v. LoganIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Stombaugh v. MoreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Allen v. PowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Reimann v. HybertsenOregon Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Valley Vue Joint VentureUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  2. Murray v. PayneMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Word Investments, Inc. v. Bruinsma (In Re TML, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API