Ex parte Larkin

Habeas Corpus before tbe Supreme Court. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion. I. No showing wa,s made, and no reason, in fact, given for either of the orders made by the court adjourning tbe bearing of tbe case. II. Tbe record in tbis case does not sbow that tbe destruction of tbe indictment by fire, or tbe sickness of tbe district attorney, were in .fact tbe causes or reasons tbat moved tbe mind of tbe court to make tbe orders, nor were tbey the real reasons, in fact, which lay at tbe foundation of tbe orders. III. Tbe cause not having been tried at the October term, and no showing made, and…