Legal Opinion
Mugnano-Bornstein v. Crowell
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided March 21, 1997No. 96-P-204PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, C.J.
The defendants, Robert Crowell and Shear-son Lehman Hutton, appeal from a Superior Court order denying their motion to confirm an arbitration award and allowing the plaintiffs motion to vacate the stay of judicial proceedings previously imposed and restore the case to the jury trial list.2
On November 20, 1989, the plaintiff, Josephine Mugnano-Bomstein, completed and signed an employment application *348containing an agreement to arbitrate any “controversy arising out of or in connection with [her] compensation, employment or termination of employment” with Shearson.3 She was subsequently hired as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Blanchette v. School Committee of WestwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Drywall Systems, Inc. v. ZVI Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Local No. 1710, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Tjart v. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Tjart v. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.