Legal Opinion

Flansburg v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 10, 1995No. 822PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

We consider in this appeal whether a claim that ineffective assistance of counsel arising out of a probation revocation proceeding may be reviewed in a post conviction proceeding under Article 27, § 645A. We shall hold that it may.

On December 5, 1985, appellant, John Flansburg, pled guilty in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to one count of a second degree sex offense. He was sentenced to seven years, with four years suspended, and five years probation upon release. In 1990, after his release and while still on probation, *398appellant was convicted of battery. Approximately a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FlansburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Matthews v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. State v. AdamsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API