Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Diamond

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 20, 1958No. 4666PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

In the present situation the gravamen of the petition is that the defendant falsely represented to the plaintiff that she was pregnant and that she had never previously been married, both of which statements were false and made to induce him to wed her. The weight of authority is that false representations as to pregnancy, made for the purpose of persuading one to enter into the marriage relation, are not cause for annulment. 35 Am. Jur., Marriage, s. 138. This is especially true when the parties had relations prior to marriage. 15 A. L. R. (2d) anno. 706, 726-728. Likewise the majority view…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. AndersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Cassin v. CassinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Husband v. WifeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API