Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Edward D. Putty v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1955No. 13778Published

1ConcurrencePope, Circuit Judge

I agree that the judgment must be reversed and the information ordered dismissed. Of course Congress might have withdrawn from this Court all jurisdiction to entertain the appeal here, Ex Parte McCardle, 7 Wall. 506, 19 L.Ed. 264; National Exchange Bank of Baltimore v. Peters, 144 U.S. 570, 12 S.Ct. 767, 36 L.Ed. 545, but § 3 of the Act of August 27, 1954, quoted in Judge Denman’s opinion, does not purport to do that. This Court still has jurisdiction to hear the appeal but under § 3 it cannot set aside the conviction on the ground there named; — we may hear the appeal but we may not reverse…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API