Legal Opinion

People v. Frazier

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 2009No. C057684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION†]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Defendant Kathy Frazier appeals following her conviction of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) 1 with an enhancement of sentence for personally inflicting great bodily injury on the victim (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)). Defendant urges us to strike her sentence enhancement on the rationale that she did not personally inflict great bodily injury when directing a dog to attack the victim. We reject the contention, and shall affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Prior dog attacks

In early January 2007, defendant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Ruff CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. TaparSuperior Court of Guam · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API