Legal Opinion

Killough v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 4, 1936No. A-9066PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, for convenience hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was by information charged with the possession of a still capable of being used in the manufacture of whisky; was tried, convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 3’0 days.

The testimony on behalf of the state shows the sheriff of Jackson county and a number of his deputies went out in the country to a farm.' known as the Helms farm looking for a still; they finally located it in a ravine; at the still were eighteen barrels of mash. Curley Sanders was in a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Handley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Darks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API