Legal Opinion

Handley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1936No. A-9117PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDayenpobt, J.

The plaintiff in error, the defendant in the trial court, was charged with the possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to barter, sell, give away, or otherwise furnish the same to others; was convicted and sentenced to serve 60 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $150 and cost. From which judgment and sentence he appeals.

The testimony on behalf of the state shows that the defendant lives in El Reno, Okla.; that George Menz owns a farm on which there is an eight-room house, and basement; that his son Lawrence Menz was occupying the premises. Lawrence Menz stated:

“About 30 days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Killough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Handley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API