Legal Opinion

Currier v. Leavitt

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 21, 2007No. Civil 06-118-B-WPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

WOODCOCK, District Judge.

For nearly a decade, Monica Currier, who suffers from macular degeneration, has been asking Medicare to reimburse her for the purchase of a video magnifier (VM), a device prescribed by her physician that allows her to read. Concluding that the VM fits within the definition of durable medical equipment (DME) and that reimbursement is long overdue, the Court re verses the Medicare Appeals Council’s denial of reimbursement.

1. STATEMENT OF FACTS

On December 17, 1997, pursuant to her doctor’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and AccessoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Dougherty v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. South Shore Hospital, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Phalp v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  2. Finigan v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  3. Statchen v. Palmer, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  4. Davis v. Ciborowski et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API