Kittinger v. Churchill
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, J.
The action is brought by plaintiff, as a stockholder of the defendant Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc., suing on behalf of himself and all other stockholders who will contribute to the expense of the action, for the purpose of setting aside the transfer of property of the association, a stock corporation, to defendant Churchill Tabernacle, a religious corporation. All of the individual defendants were and now are directors of the association. Defendants Thomas, Doherty, Werner, Waters, Fiedner, Rogers and Schilke are also the trustees of the Churchill Tabernacle.
The basic facts out of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nance v. BusbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
- Elder of First Baptist Church in Hartford v. WitherellNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- B. & C. Electrical Construction Co. v. OwenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of TysenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Berger v. National Architects' Bronze Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Gethsemane Lutheran Church v. ZachoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Kroth v. Congregation Chebra Ukadisha Bnai Israel MikalwarieNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- Temple-Ashram v. SatyanandjiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Watt Samakki Dhammikaram, Inc. v. ThenjittoNew York Supreme Court · 1995