Legal Opinion
Acushnet Co. v. Coaters, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 30, 1997No. Civil Action 93-11219-REKPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KEETON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Questions About the Terms of Final Judgment
The questions now to be decided concern what final judgment is to be entered, after extended pretrial and trial proceedings (both jury and non-jury), on claims of “settling parties” against non-settling parties for contribution of shares of remediation costs, past and future, of the “Sullivan’s Ledge Site” in New Bedford, Massachusetts.
For the reasons explained in this opinion, the court (i) orders dismissal of claims of plaintiffs against several defendants (together with dismissal of counterclaims,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kalamazoo River Study Group v. Rockwell International Corporation and Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
- Beazer East, Inc. v. Mead Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Kalamazoo River Study Group v. Rockwell InternationalDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
- BEAZER EAST, INC. v. THE MEAD CORPORATION v. KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC. THE MEAD CORPORATION, APPELLANT—CASE NO. 02-3727. BEAZER EAST, INC. v. THE MEAD CORPORATION v. KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC. THE MEAD CORPORATION, APPELLANT—CASE NO. 02-4185Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.