Legal Opinion

Rush v. Alaska Mortgage Group

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1997No. S-7348PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

1. INTRODUCTION

Linda Sue Rush entered into a real estate transaction that inadvertently extinguished her senior security interest in the land. As a result, Alaska Mortgage Group, which held the second deed of trust, became the senior lienholder. We must decide whether equitable subrogation restores the priority of Rush’s security interest. The superior court ruled against her and granted summary judgment to Alaska Mortgage Group, Gerry DePriest, and Maryanne DePriest. We reverse and remand.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In April 1976 Edward Cyrus Rush sold approximately 8.9…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Nielson v. BentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Smith v. State Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. American Restaurant Group v. ClarkAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Metcalfe Investments, Inc. v. GarrisonAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Osterman v. BaberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Burk v. Thorson, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API