Faul v. Jelco, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellants brought a personal injury tort action alleging negligence by appellee’s employee and joining appellee as defendant on the theory of respondeat superior, appellee’s motion for summary judgment, which denied the employee was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident, was granted. We affirm the summary judgment.
We view the facts most favorably to appellants to determine whether material facts are in dispute and if appellee is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Union Bank v. Pfeifer, 18 Ariz.App. 386, 502 P.2d 535 (1972).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Consolidated Motors, Inc. v. KetchamArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Anderson v. GobeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- State v. Superior Court, in & for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Wilson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bruce v. Chas Roberts Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Robarge v. Bechtel Power Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- James H. Hartzell, Beryl Hartzell, and Ross Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sheets v. ChepkoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Carnes v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.