Legal Opinion
DiSabatino v. DiSabatino Bros., Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 25, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-393-JLLPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Alfred DiSabatino complains that the defendants violated various provisions of the Comprehensive Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”), specifically those codified at 29 U.S.C. §§ 1161-68, which amended the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. Presently before the Court are plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 25), and defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (D.I. 29.) For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Patricia A. Hollinger, Administratrix of the Estate of Germaine S. Hollinger, Deceased v. Wagner Mining Equipment Company, a Division of Paccar, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Gillis v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- David and Carolyn Gaskell v. The Harvard Cooperative Society, David and Carolyn Gaskell v. The Harvard Cooperative SocietyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Jimmie Ruth Daughtrey v. Honeywell, Inc., Bull Hn Information Systems, Talent Force, Inc., AKA Temp ForceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Torres-Negron v. Ramallo Bros. Printing, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Bryant v. Food Lion, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- Roberts v. National Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
- Boucher v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1998
- Burgess v. Adams Tool & Engineering, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.