Legal Opinion

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Forrest

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 25, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

The appellee, Forrest, brought this suit against the appellant to recover, under what is known as the Johnson grass statute (Acts 27th Legislature, c. 117), the penalty prescribed for a violation of that statute, and damages to what he alleges to be four farms owned by him contiguous to the appellant’s railroad right of way, by reason of Johnson grass going to seed on such right of way during the years 1908, 1909, and 1910. The petition alleges, in substance: That plaintiff, T. C. Forrest, is now, and has been for a number of years, the owner in fee simple of four certain farms. That the same…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Doeppenschmidt v. I. G.N.R.R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. LetotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. City of Newark v. Garfield Development Corp.Licking County Municipal Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API