Legal Opinion

Doeppenschmidt v. I. G.N.R.R. Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1907No. 1662PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Judicial District. The statement and question are as follows:

"Appellant brought this suit against appellee, seeking to recover damages upon the theory that the defendant wrongfully permitted Johnson grass to mature and go to seed upon its right of way, from which it was washed to and upon the plaintiff's land, causing it to become infested with Johnson grass and materially damaged and its market value materially diminished.
"The trial court sustained a general demurrer and several special exceptions to the plaintiff's…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Martin, Wise & FitzhughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Snyder v. ComptonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Barkley v. DumkeTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Spence v. FenchlerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. City of Aransas Pass v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Burroughs Knight v. Lyles, Co. Chm.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Underwriters v. Kirby Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Central Education Agency v. Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1953

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API