Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Cochran's administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 27, 1817PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Ch. J. Boyie.

This is an appeal taken by the defendant from a judgment for ike plaintiff, in an action of detinue for a slave.

The plaintiff claims the slave by a purchase made by his intestate from Rona Mahan, on the 21st of August 1812, in the county of Barren. The defendant holds the slave as a purchaser at a sale made by the sheriff of barren county, in virtue of a fierifacias, bearing date the 22d of February 1814, which issued on a judgment obtained by the defendant against Rona Mahan in the iireckenridge circuit court: and hfe contends that the sale was legal,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waller v. BestSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Webster v. Industrial Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Hood v. WinsattCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1841
  4. Collingsworth v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1833
  5. In re Liberty Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API