Legal Opinion

Hood v. Winsatt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 26, 1841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Replevin. Case 67. Error to the Washington Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

In an action of replevin, brought by Hood and Graham against Winsatt, for a horse, the latter pleaded that whilst a fieri facias against one Bunch was alive and in the hands of a constable of Washington County, the said horse was the property of the said Bunch, and ivas in said county; that before the return or return day of that execution, Bunch fraudulently removed the horse to Marion County; that afterwards, and before the return day of the execution, it was returned to the justice who had issued it, and another fi. fa,, was, on the same day, issued and delivered to a constable of Marion,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daniel v. Cochran's administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1817
  2. Clagget v. ForeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webster v. Industrial Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Patterson v. Fowler's exr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1861
  3. In re Liberty Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933
  4. Mitchell v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API