Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Brandenburg
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentCook, J.
As I believe that the majority is incorrect in its interpretation that R.C. 2721.09 is “statutory authority” for awarding attorney fees and there exists no other ground for allowing these fees here, I respectfully dissent.
I
R.C. 2721.09 provides, “[wjhenever necessary or proper, further relief based on a declaratory judgment or decree previously granted may be given. * * *” (Emphasis added.) The “further relief’ in this and similar declaratory judgment statutes from other states allows a court to grant consequential or incidental relief such as a money judgment, injunction, specific…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Vance v. RoedersheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- G. S. T. v. City of Avon LakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Chace v. Dorcy International, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
- General Accident Assurance Corp. v. Motorists Mutl. Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965