Legal Opinion

Schuler-Haas Electric Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1976PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The affidavits submitted by the parties on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment tender no admissible proof of evidentiary facts relevant to the resolution of the asserted ambiguity in the terms of the payment bond. The present intervenors are of course bound by the record as they find it. Absent any relevant extrinsic evidence or the anticipation of the availability thereof, the resolution of any ambiguity in the written contract between the parties is to be determined by the court as a matter of law. (Hartford Acc. & Ind.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Welsbach Elec v. Mastec N. AmNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. West-Fair Electric Contractors v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Merritt-Meridian Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API