Legal Opinion

Reid v. Hans Rees' Sons Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1911PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Lane, J., at tbe January Term, 1911, of McDowell. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Walicer.

1Opinion of the CourtWaliceR, J.

Plaintiff brought tbis action to recover damages for injuries received while working in tbe defendant’s tannery in Asheville. His duty was to clean out tbe vats, and in tbe performance of tbis duty be was required to go into tbe vat and throw out tbe ginned bark, which was placed between tbe bides fqr the purpose of tanning them. In order to go into and come out of ’the vats it was necessary to use a ladder which was furnished by tbe defendant. Tbis ladder bad become worn at tbe ends which rested on tbe floor, so that they bad a round instead of a flat surface, and as tbe bottom of tbe vat…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marks v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Cotton v. North Carolina R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Pressly v. Yarn Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Avery v. West Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Pleasants v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mincey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Harmon v. Ferguson Contracting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Winborne v. Interstate Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Rogerson v. . HontzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Fowler Ex Rel. Fowler v. Carolina Cross Arm & Conduit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API