Legal Opinion

Wildearth Guardians v. Jewel

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 8, 2015No. 2:14-cv-00833 JWSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

JOHN W. SEDWICK, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

J. MOTIONS PRESENTED

At docket 75, plaintiff WildEarth Guardians (“Plaintiff’) filed a motion for summary judgment as to its challenge to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s November 14, 2013 decision denying Plaintiffs petition to list the Gunnison’s prairie dog as an endangered or threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. (“ESA”). At docket 81 defendants Sally Jewell and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Federal Defendants”) filed their response and a cross…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glamour Dolls Incorporated v. Lisa Frank IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API