Legal Opinion

Politano v. Board of Selectmen

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 10, 1981PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The plaintiff, who was found by a judge of the Superior Court to have been disabled while acting as a special police officer in Nahant, seeks by his amended complaint1 to have the defendant town indemnify him for medical expenses under G. L. c. 41, § 100, and provide him salary continuation benefits under G. L. c. 41, § 111F, and G. L. c. 32, § 85H. The defendants appeal from a “judgment” which awarded benefits under the latter two statutes, annulled the decision of the selectmen denying benefits under G. L. c. 41, § 100, and ordered the selectmen to reconsider the application in a manner…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Wormstead v. Town Manager of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Jones v. Town of WaylandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Ciszewski v. Industrial Accident BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Roberts-Haverhill v. City Coun. of HaverhillMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Buckley Nursing Home, Inc. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. McLaughlin v. City of LowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  3. Todino v. Town of WellfleetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Lexington Education Ass'n v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Rein v. Town of MarshfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API