Legal Opinion
Apotex, Inc. v. UCB, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided September 9, 2013No. Case No. 12-60706-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DONALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for final disposition of the issues presented during a bench trial held from July 29, 2013, through July 31, 2013. Apotex1 asserts that UCB2 infringes Claims 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of United States Patent No. 6,767,556 (the “'556 Patent”) by manufacturing and selling their Univasc and Uniretic products, as well as generic versions thereof. UCB contends that it does not infringe the '556 Patent and that the patent is invalid. UCB also contends that: (1) Apotex disclaimed the Univasc process from the scope…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Apotex Inc. v. Ucb, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Sandra Slater v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Sandra Slater v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016