State v. Herrmann

¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin appeals from that part of an order granting Kenneth Herrmann's motion to suppress evidence. Herrmann cross-appeals from the part of the order denying his motion to suppress evidence.1 The State argues that the trial court erred by suppressing certain statements and evidence because: (1) Herrmann's incriminatory *139statements and consent to the disclosure of marijuana located under a couch were voluntarily given; and (2) even if Herrmann did not voluntarily consent to a limited search of his apartment, there was sufficient untainted evidence to support the warrant…