State v. Carroll
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtKessler, J.
¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin appeals from an order suppressing photographic evidence obtained from a cell phone that was seized from Jermichael James Carroll. We reverse because we conclude that the evidence was ultimately seized pursuant to a valid search warrant.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. At issue is an order suppressing evidence obtained from the defendant's cell phone after he was stopped for speeding. The following facts are taken from the complaint, a search warrant application and the detective's testimony at the suppression hearing.
¶ 3. On December 6, 2006, Detective John Belsha and his partner,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- State v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. PalloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AnkerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010