Legal Opinion

State v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 28, 2008No. 2007AP1378-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKessler, J.

¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin appeals from an order suppressing photographic evidence obtained from a cell phone that was seized from Jermichael James Carroll. We reverse because we conclude that the evidence was ultimately seized pursuant to a valid search warrant.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. At issue is an order suppressing evidence obtained from the defendant's cell phone after he was stopped for speeding. The following facts are taken from the complaint, a search warrant application and the detective's testimony at the suppression hearing.

¶ 3. On December 6, 2006, Detective John Belsha and his partner,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  3. State v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. PalloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. AnkerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  3. State v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API