Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Company

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 6, 1948No. 3704PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The decree of the Court made in accordance with clearly findable facts must be affirmed.

During the trial much evidence bearing on the circumstances which surrounded the making of the contract, including the intention of the parties as expressed to each other, was introduced by both sides without objection.

"The basic idea that a contract is to be interpreted in the light of the surrounding circumstances has been applied in this jurisdiction from early times.” Pettee v. Chapter, 86 N. H. 419, 424, 425, and cases cited. See also, Occhipinti v. Weiner, 91 N. H. 388, 389. The finding of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pettee v. Omega Chapter of Alpha Gamma RhoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  2. Bee v. Chicopee Mfg. Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  3. Rogers v. United States Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  4. Occhipinti v. WeinerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cheshire Oil Co. v. Springfield Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API