Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Drevers v. Drevers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1989No. TC D087-258; CA A48832; SC S36171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this proceeding, the defendant was found in contempt and ordered “placed in the custody of the Yamhill County Sheriff for a period not to exceed 30 days.” The defendant appealed, claiming that the state did not prove that the defendant wilfully disobeyed a court order. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. 95 Or App 582, 770 P2d 619 (1989).

After the trial court’s decision, but before the Court of Appeals’ decision, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Hicks v. Feiock, 485 US 624, 108 S Ct 1423, 99 L Ed 2d 721 (1988), and held that, in criminal contempt cases, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. United Financial Systems, Inc. v. HolstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Smith v. State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Emery v. AndishaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Frohnmayer v. U-Kamp Motorhome Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API