Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Emery v. Andisha

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 1991No. D8910-67845; CA A63502PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of criminal contempt for violating a restraining order under the Family Abuse Prevention Act, ORS 107.700 etseq. The order, issued under ORS 107.718,1 restrained defendant “from molesting, interfering with, or menacing [plaintiff] and the minor children in [her] custody” and from entering her home, school, church and day care location. The trial court found that defendant violated the order by making a telephone call to plaintiffs son. Defendant argues that the court erred in holding him in contempt, because the order was so vague that he could not have known that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. Del ToroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. State ex rel. Badger v. CoueyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State ex rel. Drevers v. DreversOregon Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BaleroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API