Legal Opinion

Chandler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 18, 1989No. 88-2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction in a drug case. Appellant’s attorney filed an Anders1 brief and appellant then filed a pro se brief. Neither brief brings up anything to warrant reversal but the pro se brief does raise a competency of counsel issue which must first be directed to the trial judge under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. GordonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989