Daigre v. Julius Levin & Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Tenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Rapides. Andrews, J.
1Opinion of the Court
.The opinion of the court was delivered by
Nicholls, C. J.
Plaintiffs allege that they are owners in indi-visión, and have been for more than twelve months past in continu*415ous possession of certain property described in their petition. That said property is good pine timber land and that defendants are co-trespassers on the same, and have wrongfully cut and removed by their co-trespassing a great portion of said timber, and still continue to cut and remove said timber, though they have been specially warned not to do so by petitioners. That' they are now trespassing and have been so doing since…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goddard's Heirs v. UrquhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
3Cited by18 opinions
- Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Rush v. Town of FarmervilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Plunkett v. DendySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Bowdon Lime Works v. MossAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
- Redmond & Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.