Legal Opinion

Carter v. City of St. Louis

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 30, 2024No. 4:23-cv-01548Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL CARTER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:23 CV 1548 CDP ) CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs are Black heavy equipment operators (HEO IIs) employed by the City of St. Louis in its Refuse Division who claim that they were deprived of overtime compensation and retaliated against in violation of federal and state law. The City seeks to dismiss their complaint for failing to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The motion is granted in part…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Crest Construction II, Inc. v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API