Legal Opinion

Hull-Dobbs, Inc. v. Mallicoat

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 3, 1966PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoAMIS, P. J.

Walter H. Mallicoat, Jr., brought this action in the General Sessions Court to recover of Hull-Dobbs, Inc. “damages in an amount to be determined by the court and caused by breach of contract and fraud in the sale to plaintiff of a 1956 Ford. ’ ’ The Sessions Court rendered judgment for $628.58 which, on appeal to the Circuit Court, was affirmed. The present appeal to this court by Hull-Dobbs Inc., resulted.

The assignments are (1) that the court erred in allowing oral testimony to contradict a written instrument and (2) erred in failing to dismiss the case against the plaintiff in error under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haynes v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Overland Bond & Investment Corp. v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  2. Miller v. BadgleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. Lecates v. Hertrich Pontiac Buick Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Casavant v. CampopianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  5. Board of Directors v. Southwestern Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API